Lotus NY

Restaurant in New York

Thai Restaurant

Weather

Scattered clouds
10 °C
Humidity: 62%

A little piece of Bangkok located in a landmark lower 5th Avenue building in Greenwich Village.

Only opened in the spring of 2011, the restaurant has undergone a name change this year from Lotus of Siam to Lotus NY. This is a delightful up-market restaurant that has a great buzz about it coupled with traditional Northern Thai style dishes that are really superb.  We also found the all Thai staff to be attentive and the service was excellent.

The food was beautifully presented and had a crisp clean and fresh taste with a good selection of appetizers, noodles, Thai Curries as well as seafood and meat.

We decided to go for a mix of smaller and larger dishes and share so we could try lots of things.  So we had the Mango and Sticky Rice, Shrimp with Duck, stuffed boneless Chicken Wing, Chicken Satay, Pork with Basil and mild yellow Curry with Chicken – and there were only two of us!  Needless to say we did not have a dessert.

They have a very comprehensive wine list as well as an assortment of cocktails and beers from Thailand, Japan, the US and England.  We opted for the Singha Thai Lager, which was actually very good.  They offer a good range of wines by the glass starting at around $10 from Europe and California.  They also offer half and full bottles across the list, which you don’t see often.  Half bottles start at around $20 and whole bottles from $38 upwards.

Dinner for two of us came to $46 per head excluding service.

The restaurant is only open for dinner from 5:30pm to 11pm Monday through Saturday.

Lotus NY on Urbanspoon

Reviewer's Rating
Cuisine Thai
Need to book Advisable
Clientele Locals
Restaurant good for Romance , Entertaining clients , Meeting up with friends
Cost per head Medium
Dress Code Casual, Smart Casual
Dining Options Dinner

Additional Ambience Information

A mild colonial club feel that is modern, clean and vibrant.

Last updated on 08-05-2012

blog comments powered by Disqus

Show me more: